Oral Covid-19 Antiviral Candidate LAU-7b Demonstrates 100[percnt] Reduction of the Risk of Progression to Mechanical Ventilation and Death in Hospitalized Moderate-to-Severe Covid-19 Patients

Rationale: LAU-7b is developed as a broadly effective oral COVID-19 therapeutic targeting membrane lipids to exert dual antiviral and inflammation-controlling activity. SARS-CoV-2 reprograms host cellular lipid metabolism to favor entry and replication, a mechanism shared by all lipid-enveloped viruses. LAU-7b decreases host cell membrane lipids fluidity, inhibits de-novo cell lipogenesis, and modulates phospholipid signaling promoting resolution of inflammation. Due to its host-directed mutation-agnostic mechanism, LAU-7b utility could span across future variants, as demonstrated in-vitro against multiple SARS-CoV-2 strains and MERS-CoV. RESOLUTION, a large Phase 2/3 study evaluating LAU-7b in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, is ongoing in the US and Canada, and preliminary Phase 2 results are presented. Methods: RESOLUTION is a placebocontrolled study of oral LAU-7b, once-a-day for 14 days on top of standard of care, in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at risk of developing pulmonary complications. The Phase 2 portion of the study randomized 148 patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 and 84 patients in critical condition, but not on invasive ventilation. Key endpoints included proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 29, rates of progression to mechanical ventilation and all-causes death by Day 60, time to recovery and length of hospitalization. Results: Both study arms were highly comparable in terms of mean age, number of comorbidities and concomitant medications. LAU-7b demonstrated a 100% reduction in the risk of progressing to mechanical ventilation or death by Day 60 in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 patients. None of the 76 patients on LAU-7b required mechanical ventilation and none died, while 5 out of 72 patients on placebo progressed to mechanical ventilation (6.9% difference, p=0.025), and 4 patients died (5.6% difference, p=0.053). LAU-7b group also showed an increase of 6.9% (p=0.055) in the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 29, versus placebo. Patients on LAU-7b tended to recover more rapidly and leave hospital faster. LAU-7b was well-tolerated, with safety comparable to placebo. Critically ill patients treated with LAU-7b did not show improvement over placebo, suggesting that COVID-19 patients in respiratory failure at baseline are too severely affected to benefit. Conclusion: LAU-7b showed positive results in the trial's Phase 2 portion on both survival and avoidance of mechanical ventilation in moderate-to-severe COVID-19. The confirmatory Phase 3 portion was triggered and received approval from the FDA and Health Canada, focusing on moderate-to-severe COVID-19 and using the “Proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and/or death by Day 60” as primary efficacy endpoint.

The shift to pediatric rheumatology telemedicine practice impacts the ability to assess and document critical JIA outcome data: A survey within the PR-COIN network

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the traditional inperson healthcare delivery model, prompting a shift to telemedicine to ensure continuity of care for pediatric rheumatology patients. The change to virtual practice affected healthcare provider's assessments of disease activity in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) as they were unable to perform hands-on physical assessments. Understanding the impact of this shift is critical to help address any care gaps that are faced during virtual visits for patients with JIA. Objectives: The objectives of the survey were four-fold: a) understand the impact of the switch from in-person to telemedicine visits from the healthcare provider perspective;b) identify the barriers and facilitators to collecting critical data elements that are important in monitoring JIA disease activity and outcomes;c) identify tools that providers are using during their telemedicine visits to perform disease activity assessments;and d) examine the impact of the telemedicine healthcare delivery on clinical research. Methods: A cross-sectional survey sent to members from all Pediatric Rheumatology Care and Outcomes Improvement Network (PR-COIN) centers (n=21) with total number of targeted respondents of 121. The survey was sent out for completion between 08/17/2020 - 09/ 02/2020. Quantitative responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative responses were analyzed by content and theme. Results: Survey ersponse rate was 98% (n=119) 90% fully completed. Most respondents (99%) indicated that they documented six critical data elements [CDE] (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, active joint count, morning stiffness, arthritis-related pain, and completion of uveitis screen) in 75% of telemedicine visits. Most respondents (74%) indicated that they documented active joint count over 70% of the time, while 30% of respondents reported barriers to documenting active joint count such as inability to palpate joints and the inability to visualize all joints on virtual examination. Identified barriers to assessment and visit documentation included challenges with assessing joint disease activity and platform technical issues. Ten percent of the respondents reported they often forgot to document CDE during telemedicine visits, indicating that setting up automated reminders in their electronic medical records may help with increasing their likelihood of documentation. A few centers reported having processes to assist with the collection of patient data in advance of the visit, such as pre-visitquestionnaires and planning. The ability to perform research activities was significantly impacted with only 37% of centers reported participating in research activities via telemedicine, and 29% reported their ability to consent patients via telemedicine visits. Conclusion: There are multiple barriers and facilitators to conducting successful clinical visits as well as performing clinical research over telemedicine. Our data suggests variation in telemedicine practice and process across centers, as well as within each center, reflecting the need to standardize the process of telemedicine visits. Given that a portion of patients with JIA will likely continue to be serviced over telemedicine post-pandemic, teams need to adapt their existing practices to continue providing quality care and integrating clinical research over this platform where appropriate.

Acute Kidney Injury and Renal Replacement Therapy in COVID-19 Versus Other Respiratory Viruses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially fatal complication of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Binding of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, to its viral receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), results in viral entry and may cause AKI. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the frequencies of AKI and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and compared those frequencies with patients who were infected by respiratory viruses that bind or downregulate ACE2 (ACE2-associated viruses) and viruses that do not bind nor downregulate ACE2 (non-ACE2-associated viruses). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Observational studies on COVID-19 and other respiratory viral infections reporting AKI and RRT were included. The exclusion criteria were non-English articles, non-peer-reviewed articles, review articles, studies that included patients under the age of 18, studies including fewer than 10 patients, and studies not reporting AKI and RRT rates. PATIENTS: Adult COVID-19, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and influenza patients. MEASUREMENTS: We extracted the following data from the included studies: author, year, study location, age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, shock, vasopressor use, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU mortality, AKI, and RRT. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE for articles reporting AKI or RRT. AKI was defined by authors of included studies. Critical illness was defined by ICU admission. We performed a random effects meta-analysis to calculate pooled estimates for the AKI and RRT rate within each virus group using a random intercept logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 23 655 hospitalized, critically ill COVID-19 patients, AKI frequencies were not significantly different between COVID-19 patients (51%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-57%) and critically ill patients infected with ACE2-associated (56%, 95% CI: 37%-74%, P = .610) or non-ACE2-associated viruses (63%, 95% CI: 43%-79%, P = .255). Pooled RRT rates were also not significantly different between critically ill, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (20%, 95% CI: 16%-24%) and ACE2-associated viruses (18%, 95% CI: 8%-33%, P = .747). RRT rates for both COVID-19 and ACE2-associated viruses were significantly different (P < .001 for both) from non-ACE2-associated viruses (49%, 95% CI: 44%-54%). After adjusting for shock or vasopressor use, AKI and RRT rates were not significantly different between groups. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this study include the heterogeneity of definitions of AKI that were used across different virus studies. We could not match severity of infection or do propensity matching across studies. Most of the included studies were conducted in retrospective fashion. Last, we did not include non-English publications. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that viral ACE2 association does not significantly alter the rates of AKI and RRT among critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. However, the rate of RRT is lower in patients with COVID-19 or ACE2-associated viruses when compared with patients infected with non-ACE2-binding viruses, which might partly be due to the lower frequencies of shock and use of vasopressors in these two virus groups. Prospective studies are necessary to demonstrate whether modulation of the ACE2 axis with Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors impacts the rates of AKI and whether they are beneficial or harmful in COVID-19 patients.

MISE EN CONTEXTE: L'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) est une complication potentiellement mortelle de la maladie à coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Obligatoire du Coronavirus 2 du Syndrome Respiratoire Aigu Sévère (SARS-CoV-2), le virus responsable du COVID-19, à son récepteur, l'enzyme de conversion de l'angiotensine 2 (ACE2), entraîne une entrée virale et peut provoquer une IRA. OBJECTIFS DE L'ÉTUDE: Nous avons effectué une revue systématique et une méta-analyse des fréquences de l'IRA et de la thérapie de remplacement renal (RRT) chez les patients COVID-19 gravement malades et a comparé ces fréquences avec les patients qui ont été infectés par des voies respiratoires virus qui lient ou régulent négativement l'ACE2 (virus associés à l'ACE2) et les virus qui ne régulent pas négativement ni ne lient l'ACE2 (virus non associés à l'ACE2). CADRE ET TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Revue systématique et méta-analyse. Des études d'observation sur le COVID-19 et d'autres infections virales respiratoires signalant une AKI et une RRT ont été incluses. Les critères d'exclusion étaient des articles non anglophones, des articles non évalués par des pairs, des articles de revue, des études incluant des patients moins de 18 ans, les études incluant moins de 10 patients et les études ne rapportant pas les taux d'IRA et de RRT. PATIENTS: Adultes COVID-19, syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SRAS), syndrome respiratoire du Moyen-Orient (MERS) et malades de la grippe. MESURES: Nous avons extrait les données suivantes des études incluses : auteur, année, lieu de l'étude, âge, sexe, race, diabète sucré, hypertension, maladie rénale chronique, état de choc, utilisation de vasopresseurs, mortalité, admission en unité de soins intensifs (USI), Mortalité en soins intensifs, AKI et RRT. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Nous avons systématiquement recherché dans PubMed et EMBASE les articles rapportant AKI ou RRT. AKI a été défini par les auteurs des études incluses. La maladie grave a été définie par l'admission aux soins intensifs. Nous avons effectué une méta-analyse à effets aléatoires pour calculer estimations regroupées pour le taux d'IRA et de RRT au sein de chaque groupe de virus à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logistique d'interception aléatoire. RÉSULTATS: Sur 23 655 patients hospitalisés et gravement malades COVID-19, les fréquences AKI n'étaient pas significativement différentes entre patients COVID-19 (51 %, intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC] : 44 %-57 %) et patients gravement malades infectés par l'ACE2 associé (56 %, IC à 95 % : 37 % à 74 %, P = 0,610) ou des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (63 %, IC à 95 % : 43 % à 79 %, P = 0,255). Tarifs RRT groupés n'étaient pas non plus significativement différents entre les patients hospitalisés gravement malades atteints de COVID-19 (20 %, IC à 95 % : 16 % à 24 %) et virus associés à l'ACE2 (18 %, IC à 95 % : 8 % à 33 %, P = 0,747). Taux de RRT pour les virus associés au COVID-19 et à l'ACE2 étaient significativement différents (P < 0,001 pour les deux) des virus non associés à l'ACE2 (49 %, IC à 95 % : 44 % à 54 %). Après ajustement pour le choc ou l'utilisation de vasopresseurs, les taux d'IRA et de RRT n'étaient pas significativement différents entre les groupes. LIMITES DE L'ÉTUDE: Les limites de cette étude incluent l'hétérogénéité des définitions de l'IRA qui ont été utilisées pour différents virus études. Nous n'avons pas pu faire correspondre la gravité de l'infection ou faire une correspondance de propension entre les études. La plupart des études incluses ont été menées de manière rétrospective. Enfin, nous n'avons pas inclus les publications non anglophones. CONCLUSIONS: Nos résultats suggèrent que l'association virale ACE2 ne modifie pas de manière significative les taux d'IRA et de RRT parmi les patients gravement malades admis aux soins intensifs. Cependant, le taux de RRT est plus faible chez les patients atteints de COVID-19 ou associés à l'ACE2 virus par rapport aux patients infectés par des virus ne se liant pas à l'ACE2, ce qui pourrait être dû en partie à la plus faible fréquences de choc et utilisation de vasopresseurs dans ces deux groupes de virus. Des études prospectives sont nécessaires pour démontrer si la modulation de l'axe ACE2 avec les inhibiteurs du système rénine-angiotensine a un impact sur les taux d'IRA et si ells sont bénéfiques ou nocifs chez les patients COVID-19.

Pediatric Subspecialty Adoption of Telemedicine Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Early Descriptive Analysis

Telemedicine has rapidly expanded in many aspects of pediatric care as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about what factors may make pediatric subspeciality care more apt to long-term adoption of telemedicine. To better delineate the potential patient, provider, and subspecialty factors which may influence subspecialty adoption of telemedicine, we reviewed our institutional experience. The top 36 pediatric subspecialties at Stanford Children's Health were classified into high telemedicine adopters, low telemedicine adopters, and telemedicine reverters. Distance from the patient's home, primary language, insurance type, institutional factors such as wait times, and subspecialty-specific clinical differences correlated with differing patterns of telemedicine adoption. With greater awareness of these factors, institutions and providers can better guide patients in determining which care may be best suited for telemedicine and develop sustainable long-term telemedicine programming.

A Social Distancing Index: Evaluating Navigational Policies on Human Proximity using Crowd Simulations

The importance of social distancing for public health is well established. However, the policies and regulations regarding occupancy rates have not been designed with this in mind. While there are analytical tools and related measures that are used in practice to evaluate how the design of a built environment serves the needs of its intended occupants, these metrics cannot directly apply to the problem of preventing the spread of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. By using a crowd-based simulator using three levels of behavior and agent control in a given environment, a novel evaluation metric for a space layout can be calculated to reflect the proclivity of maintaining a safe distance throughout the shopping experience. We refer to this metric as the Social Distancing Index (SDI), accounting for the occupancy throughput and number of distance-based violations found. Through a case study of a realistic retail store, we demonstrate the proposed platforms performance and output on multiple scenarios by changing agent-behavior, occupancy rate, and navigational guidelines. © 2020 ACM.